Sholio (![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
sholio) wrote in ![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
ssrconfidential2017-02-28 08:59 pm
sholio) wrote in ssrconfidential2017-02-28 08:59 pm
Entry tags:
Tag nominations are open!
Nominations are open at the 2017 SSR Confidential tag set!
You can nominate up to four characters and relationships (total) that you would like to request or offer in the exchange. (In the exchange itself you will be able to request up to six, and offer more. Nominations, however, are capped at four since a basic set of characters and relationships is already available.)
Before nominating, check the tag set to see if the ones you want are already there. If so, you do not have to nominate anything (it isn't a qualifying step in order to participate).
If you nominate relationships, please enter them in the "Character" field and name them like this: "Relationship: Character's Full Name & Character's Full Name" (for gen) or "Relationship: Character's Full Name/Character's Full Name" (for ship). For example: "Relationship: Peggy Carter/Angie Martinelli". You can include more than two characters in a relationship, and crossovers with other fandoms as long as at least one of them is an Agent Carter character. Please do not mix gen and ship in one relationship (for example, "Relationship: Peggy Carter/Howard Stark/Edwin Jarvis" is fine, but not "Relationship: Peggy Carter/Howard Stark & Edwin Jarvis").
Nominating characters should be self-explanatory. Use their full names, if known. You can only nominate Agent Carter characters, not characters from other fandoms or other parts of the MCU (although crossover characters can be part of relationships).
Let me know if you have any questions or need help with the form. Nominations will close on March 12.
This post on Tumblr (for reblogging purposes).
You can nominate up to four characters and relationships (total) that you would like to request or offer in the exchange. (In the exchange itself you will be able to request up to six, and offer more. Nominations, however, are capped at four since a basic set of characters and relationships is already available.)
Before nominating, check the tag set to see if the ones you want are already there. If so, you do not have to nominate anything (it isn't a qualifying step in order to participate).
If you nominate relationships, please enter them in the "Character" field and name them like this: "Relationship: Character's Full Name & Character's Full Name" (for gen) or "Relationship: Character's Full Name/Character's Full Name" (for ship). For example: "Relationship: Peggy Carter/Angie Martinelli". You can include more than two characters in a relationship, and crossovers with other fandoms as long as at least one of them is an Agent Carter character. Please do not mix gen and ship in one relationship (for example, "Relationship: Peggy Carter/Howard Stark/Edwin Jarvis" is fine, but not "Relationship: Peggy Carter/Howard Stark & Edwin Jarvis").
Nominating characters should be self-explanatory. Use their full names, if known. You can only nominate Agent Carter characters, not characters from other fandoms or other parts of the MCU (although crossover characters can be part of relationships).
Let me know if you have any questions or need help with the form. Nominations will close on March 12.
This post on Tumblr (for reblogging purposes).
no subject
The other question is, what about Betty Carver (Radio Actor)? That's how she's listed in imdb. I don't mean the character, obviously, but the actress who plays her -- what does she think of Peggy, of the part, would she have run into Peggy, or Angie? Or is that just too out there since we know diddly about the character really?
no subject
It is completely fine to nominate both of these characters! And to use them in combination with other characters. We definitely had people both offer and request Bernard last year.
no subject
or poor Jarvis tries dropping him off three mansions down the blockAwesome, thank you! \o/
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject